Latin is where the etymological origin of the term corroborate. Specifically, it derives from the verb "corroborare," which can be translated as "giving force to something." It is a word that is the result of the sum of several components of that language:
-The prefix "co-", which means "together" or "everything."
-The noun "robur", which is synonymous with "red oak".
-The suffix "-ar", which is the ending used to shape the verbs.
The concept is used to refer to what a person does when, providing more information or a new reasoning, confers more force to an opinion or an argument.
The notion is usually linked to the action from check something through different kinds of evidence . When an event is credited, demonstrated or justified through various data or judgments, it can be corroborated.
For example: “The police are waiting for the judge's order to enter the address and confirm if the suspect is still in place”, "I need to corroborate certain data before publishing the article", "The researchers intend to corroborate when the event happened".
In the field of journalism , it is considered necessary to consult at least three sources for corroborate an information . This means that if three different people affirm the same about an event, the risk of publishing inaccurate data is reduced. On the other hand, if the information is presented from the sayings of a single individual, it is more likely that what is published is not accurate or even that it is fallacious.
The sources are one of the main instruments of work of journalists. Hence, those should give them the assurance and certainty that they do not lie to them. Therefore, it is important that they always corroborate them, however, when these sources always give them reliable news, they will turn them into a great pillar for their work. And they will rely on them to be able to access more information or to be able to contrast data that comes to them from other parties.
In the same way, it is necessary for the journalist to take care of their sources and, above all, not to reveal them. And, in many cases, they are usually people who hold certain relevant positions or who have positions where they access a lot of information. Therefore, it is necessary not to bring them to light because if they did they would not only put them in a complicated situation, which could even make them lose their job, but also the transfer of information they would grant.
In many contexts it is necessary to corroborate a thought, a hypothesis or a idea before taking one decision . Suppose a man wishes to hire an architect to build his new home. Prior to hiring, he decides to visit several constructions made by the architect in question and consult other clients to corroborate his professionalism. With these certainties, the person can decide with greater certainty since he has a background that justifies hiring.